were considered a non-profit organization in a way right? cause if we are i could get us up to a $10,000 sponsor! probably (most definately)not that much, but still, a high end company sponsoring us would be REALLY HELPFUL! would it not?  

--Last edited by sntw on 2006-11-17 11:20:46 --

That would be extremely helpful, except I don't know if we really qualify as non-profit; I'd say that one's a Lex call.

As of right now?

lex said non-profit so i listed us! we are listed as a "non-profit organization. need only small amount of money to make a movie. now there is a very high chance of not getting anything in return so dont expect anything. great chance for a small business to get a little rep as a warm-hearted company."  

--Last edited by sntw on 2006-11-20 10:45:50 --

still waiting for offers, but i listed us on friday so its only been 3 days.

Could we all talk about it before to make a big decision like this. Because if we make this movie a big sucess, we'll get enough money to work on another movie and get paid for it. So, it would be better to wait what everyone thinks about it...

I would've never thought of listing this as a small business but if that's what is needed to get this started off in a good direction, then I'm all for it. You know what they say "You can't do anything for free." Well maybe not in those words but you know.

There was once a TV Network that replied in the AirLex blog, I thought nothing of it, but I discussed it with Lex.

It wasnt a TV network, it was a graphic design company.

Either way, it'd be some serious coal to our fire.

Interesting Avatars Lex, Hookavah

Heh, I could not resist...

What is he feeding her? peanuts?

Looks like walnuts.

Not normal ones, I'd wager.  


It's not this topic, but it is news--our summary will be "finis"
pretty soon!

       

Yay! Can't wait to read it.    

I realize most of you hate Disney, but I consider this good news for the animation field in general:

Disney To Halt DVD Sequels


The Walt Disney Co. will no longer produce direct-to-video sequels of its animated features, according to Disney watcher Jim Hill. Hill, who has had a hit-and-miss record in reporting on inside decisions at the company, said that Sharon Morrill, president of DisneyToon Studios, has been forced to step down as part of the decision to shut down the group that produces the DVD sequels. Prior to Disney's acquisition of Pixar, Pixar executives Steve Jobs and John Lasseter had publicly complained about the quality of the sequels, maintaining that they undercut the value of the original features. Disney executives had responded that the sequels had proved to be enormously successful for the studio. According to Hill, Lasseter made the decision to halt further production of the DVD sequels and fire Morrill after viewing a "work-in-progress version" of The Tinkerbell Movie, which Hill described as "an awful mess." Hill said that Lasseter complained to Disney chief Robert Iger that the movie was "virtually unwatchable." As a direct result of that meeting, Hill wrote, "some $30 million worth of animation had to be scrapped."